PRE2022 3 Group2: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Tessa) |
(→Tessa) |
||
| Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
#[https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40686-7_1 Matsuno, F., Sato, N., Kon, K., Igarashi, H., Kimura, T., & Murphy, R. (2013). Utilization of Robot Systems in Disaster Sites of the Great Eastern Japan Earthquake. ''Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics'', 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40686-7_1] --> usage of robotics after earthquake in Japan | #[https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40686-7_1 Matsuno, F., Sato, N., Kon, K., Igarashi, H., Kimura, T., & Murphy, R. (2013). Utilization of Robot Systems in Disaster Sites of the Great Eastern Japan Earthquake. ''Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics'', 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40686-7_1] --> usage of robotics after earthquake in Japan | ||
#Lindqvist, B., Karlsson, S., Koval, A., Tevetzidis, I., Haluška, J., Kanellakis, C., Agha-mohammadi, A. A., & Nikolakopoulos, G. (2022). Multimodality robotic systems: Integrated combined legged-aerial mobility for subterranean search-and-rescue. ''Robotics and Autonomous Systems'', ''154'', 104134. <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2022.104134</nowiki> --> Spot Boston Dynamics | |||
====Kaj==== | ====Kaj==== | ||
Revision as of 15:41, 9 February 2023
Group members
| Name | Student Number | Study |
|---|---|---|
| Clinton Emok | ||
| Richard Farla | 1420380 | BCS |
| Yash Israni | 1415883 | BCS |
| Tessa de Jong | 1498312 | BPT |
| Kaj Scholer | ||
| Pepijn Tennebroek | 1470221 | BPT |
Week 1
Task division:
- Problem statement and objectives - Pepijn & Tessa
- Who are the users? - Clinton
- What do they require? - Yash
- Approach, milestones and deliverables - Kaj & Richard
- Who’s doing what? - Everyone
- State-of-the-art literature - Everyone
- Look at past projects - Everyone
Problem statement and objectives
Spot robot (or mini drones) - inspecting dangerous areas after earthquakes or other natural disasters. Spot is an agile mobile robot that navigates terrain with unprecedented mobility, allowing you to automate routine inspection tasks and data capture safely, accurately, and frequently. Inspecting how it can be used after disasters such as in Turkey and Syria.
Who are the users?
What do they require?
Approach, milestones and deliverables
Who’s doing what?
State-of-the-art literature
Clinton
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Richard
- https://patents.justia.com/patent/11548151 --> closely related to traversing terrain that is riddled with fallen objects and debris
- https://api.scienceweb.uz/storage/publication_files/648/326/617bd96706295___Specially%20Designed%20Multi-Functional%20Search%20And%20Rescue%20Robot.pdf --> proposed search and rescue robot
- https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.21887 --> state-of-the-art and future outlook of rescue robots
- https://www.mdpi.com/557488 --> drones to detect signs of life in dangerous areas
- https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISET.2016.7856489 --> robot for alive human detection in unreachable points of a disaster area
Yash
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Tessa
- Matsuno, F., Sato, N., Kon, K., Igarashi, H., Kimura, T., & Murphy, R. (2013). Utilization of Robot Systems in Disaster Sites of the Great Eastern Japan Earthquake. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40686-7_1 --> usage of robotics after earthquake in Japan
- Lindqvist, B., Karlsson, S., Koval, A., Tevetzidis, I., Haluška, J., Kanellakis, C., Agha-mohammadi, A. A., & Nikolakopoulos, G. (2022). Multimodality robotic systems: Integrated combined legged-aerial mobility for subterranean search-and-rescue. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 154, 104134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2022.104134 --> Spot Boston Dynamics
Kaj
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Pepijn
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Look at past projects