PRE2017 4 Groep6: Difference between revisions

From Control Systems Technology Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with 'The patent on remote control systems granted to Mitsubishi Electric Crop. By the US government. This document is a thorough description of how remote control systems work, if we …')
 
 
(103 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The patent on remote control systems granted to Mitsubishi Electric Crop. By the US government. This document is a thorough description of how remote control systems work, if we decide to make our vehicle remote controlled all the info we need is in here. But it is incredibly lengthy and written in a way that is not pleasant to read, so use it as a last resort. https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/eb/4b/ce/ba560b94ae5c1a/US5554980.pdf
== Group members ==
* David van den Beld,   1001770
* Gerben Erens,         0997906
* Luc Kleinman,        1008097
* Maikel Morren,        1002099
* Adine van Wier,      0999813


This 2 page article is a statement from Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla, about his predictions for autonomous cars in the near future. It shows his vision, which is directly linked to his companies (one of the biggest on this market) vision. http://www.oharas.com/ET/elonmusk.pdf
== Project pages ==
For all the branches of the project diverging from the initial set-up and planning, please see their respective pages;


To get our car driving smoothly, we will probably utilize a remote control, meaning that it will be very closely related to a remote controlled toy car, to which this doc. is the current active patent. It shows the state of the art radio controlled toy car technology currently available. https://patents.google.com/patent/US4457101A/en
* [[General Literature Review]]
* [[Extended Literature Review]]
* [[Case studies]]
* [[User and product analysis]]
* [[Designing the robot]]
* [[User interface and communication model]]
* [[Project documentation]]
* [[Project reflection]]


A guide to help us control a servo motor with our computer, as a servo motor is the most likely option if we want our car to drive without outside help. http://www.instructables.com/id/How-to-Dynamically-control-a-servo-or-motor-throug/
This page itself is dedicated to general information about the project, i.e. problem statement, goal, planning, etc..


A short article on the workings of servo motors, the main two interesting reads are the control of the servo and the different types, as we will have to chose one if we opt to use servo’s to drive our car around. https://www.jameco.com/jameco/workshop/howitworks/how-servo-motors-work.html
== Project ==


Even though this site is a webshop, and not a scientific article, it shows what technology we can buy within a respectable price range and thus shows what we do not need to make ourselves. Before we start thinking about how to make a part of our robot, lets first check what this shop has got. https://www.tinytronics.nl/shop/nl
=== Project Statement ===
Wildfires are occurring throughout the world at an increasing rate. Great droughts in various regions across the globe are increasing the probability of wildfires to occur. National parks deal with major wildfires multiple times a year. Areas devastated by wildfires are mostly devoid of life, while potentially still having an extremely fertile soil containing all the biomass left after the fire. Artificial reforestation can accelerate the natural process which accounts for the regrowth of the forests. This process might be enhanced by means of technology, for example by deploying robots that plant seeds of saplings in these areas. <br>
 
This project investigates the possibility and potential of utilizing robots to restore these devastated areas to their former glory. In order to investigate this possibility, a thorough analysis of different methods of reforestation is made first. By comparing methods of reforestation a great deal can be learned about which negative aspects of the current reforestation methods should be enhanced by a new reforestation robot. Also, this analysis will explore if a new method of reforestation is needed at all. Beyond this, two case studies are investigated. These case studies show how reforestation and forest fires are currently being handled. The case help studies help to get a better understanding of what the robot should be able to do and what it ought not to be able to do and thus help to define design criteria. <br>
 
Finally, multiple preliminary designs are made for the seeding mechanism of the robot which would accomplish all necessities found during the analysis of the different reforestation methods and which follows all the criteria discovered in the case studies. Out of these designs, the one ranking highest on the criteria unraveled during the literature review and case studies is chosen to be the best suitable seeding mechanism for the future robot. Additionally, a design is made for a user interface that will allow the staff of a national park to control a swarm of robots in a user-friendly and non time consuming way. Lastly, some suggestions for future research are given, in the topics of what other crucial functionalities the robot requires, how the robots would be able to communicate among themselves during operation, and how the robots would be able to communicate with the user in case of unforeseen circumstances. To conclude, this project aims to assess the necessity of a robot to rebuild a forest in a national park after a forest fire, discover the functionalities such a robot must have and design a user interface to control such robots based on the gained information.
 
=== Planning ===
 
Below follows the planning for the project for the upcoming 9 weeks constituting the course 0LAUK0 Project: Robots Everywhere.
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: left; color: black; border:1px solid black; border-collapse: collapse;" border="1"
|+ '''Table 1: Final project planning after revision problem statement and goals'''
! Week number
! Task
! Person assigned
|-
| 1
|
|
|-
|
| Choose definitive subject
| Collaborative effort of all members
|-
|
| Define problem statement and objectives
| David
|-
|
| Define users
| Adine
|-
|
| Obtain user requirements
| Gerben
|-
|
| Work out typical use cases
| Luc
|-
|
| Define the milestones and deliverables
| Maikel
|-
|
| Define the approach of the problem
| Collaborative effort of all members
|-
|
| Search for relevant state-of-the-art (SotA) sources, categories: <br>
# Modularity <br>
# (Semi-) Autonomous cars <br>
# Sensors for prospecting/evaluating ground <br>
# Drilling/plowing/seeding mechanism <br>
# Current Forestation combat methods <br>
| All divided into the subcategories: <br>
# Maikel <br>
# David <br>
# Luc <br>
# Gerben <br>
# Adine <br>
|-
|
| Make project planning
| Collaborative effort of all members
|-
| 2
|
|
|-
|
| Review user requirements and use cases
| Collaborative effort of all members
|-
|
| Finish collecting SotA articles and write SotA section
| Each member for their respective subcategory
|-
|
| Research different application sectors for reforestation to narrow problem statement: <br>
# Reforestation in logging industry <br>
# Reforestation in national parks after forest fires <br>
# Reforestation in nature reserves and rain forests <br>
| All divided into categories: <br>
# Adine & Maikel <br>
# David & Gerben <br>
# Luc
|-
|
| Make preliminary robot designs for the following seeding mechanisms:
# Drilling robot <br>
# Sprinkler robot <br>
# Plow robot <br>
| Divided into:
# David <br>
# Gerben <br>
# Maikel <br>
|-
| 3
|
|
|-
|
| Review and narrowing of problem statement
| Collaborative effort of all members
|-
|
| Extended literature review on specific subject of reforestation: <br>
# Biodiversity and need for control <br>
# Natural reforestation versus artificial reforestation <br>
# Direct seeding (manual seeding) <br>
# Aerial seeding <br>
| All divided into the following categories: <br>
# Collaborative effort of all group members during own research <br>
# David & Adine <br>
# Luc & Gerben <br>
# Maikel <br>
|-
|
| Rewrite problem statement
| Luc
|-
|
| Review users for narrowed problem
| Adine
|-
| 4
|
|
|-
|
| Edit the general literature review on wiki
| Maikel
|-
|
| Research the costs of reforestation methods: <br>
# Natural reforestation <br>
# Aerial reforestation <br>
# Manual reforestation <br>
| Divided by: <br>
# Adine <br>
# Maikel <br>
# Luc <br>
|-
|
| Rewrite segment of need for control and biodiversity into one introductory segement
| David
|-
|
| Start making 3D skechtes of preliminary designs
| Gerben
|-
|
| Document wiki on extended literature review page
| Adine
|-
|
| Start keeping a log of the research and design process
| Adine
|-
|
| Look for case studies
| Maikel & Luc
|-
| 5
|
|
|-
|
| Write case studies
| Maikel & Luc
|-
|
| Remake planning to fit new goal of the project
| Maikel
|-
|
| Redefine objectives to fit new goal of project
| David
|-
|
| Rewrite drilling mechanism section
| Gerben
|-
|
| Finish a first 3D model
| Gerben
|-
| 6
|
|
|-
|
| Continue 3D modelling
| Gerben
|-
|
| Elaborate and extend upon current preliminary designs (including sketch)
| Maikel, Gerben & David
|-
|
| Write wiki page for case studies
| Luc & Maikel
|-
|
| Evaluate designs using criteria from literature study
| Adine
|-
| 7
|
|
|-
|
| Compile an overview of project progress by week
| Adine
|-
|
| Start building a user interface
| Luc & Gerben
|-
|
| Evaluate the project and analyse pitfalls
| Maikel & David
|-
|
| Start making the presentation
| David & Adine
|-
|
| Start an editorial run over the entire wiki
| Maikel
|-
|
| Continue making user interface
| Luc & Gerben
|-
| 8
|
|
|-
|
| Finish writing last segments for the wiki
| Collaborative effort of all members
|-
|
| Finish final presentation
| Adine, David
|-
|
| Complete wiki
| Gerben, Luc
|-
|
| Finish editorial run over wiki
| Maikel
|-
|
| Buffer time
| Collaborative effort of all members
|}
 
 
=== Approach ===
The problem will be approached by means of a design question. What would be the best design for an effective seeding mechanism which can be used in a mobile robot deployed in a reforestation operation, and how would this robot be controlled? The gross of the project is carried out sequentially as each subject builds further upon the conclusion reached during the last subject, which is represented in the structure of this Wiki consisting of several subpages corresponding to these subjects. Albeit that the project is carried out sequentially, within each sequence several tasks are divided such that they can be carried out in parallel by different group members. During the last phase of the project, when the major milestones have been finished, the project wrap up consists of several small independent task which will allow us to abandon the sequential structure which was necessary during the other phases and carry out these tasks in parallel to gain in time.
 
 
=== Milestones and Deliverables ===
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: left; color: black; border:1px solid black; border-collapse: collapse;" border="1"
|+ '''Table 2: Milestones'''
|-
! Date
! Accomplished
|-
| 30-04-2018
| SotA research done
|-
| 03-05-2018
| Have problem narrowed down
|-
| 17-05-2018
| Finish collecting data about reforestation techniques
|-
| 24-05-2018
| Have case studies finished
|-
| 31-05-2018
| Have preliminary designs including 3D model and pick winner design
|-
| 07-06-2018
| Have analysis of communication requirements and control sequence
|-
| 14-06-2018
| Finish user interface
|-
| 14-06-2018
| Presentation is finished
|-
| 21-06-2018
| Wiki is completely updated
|}

Latest revision as of 10:55, 21 June 2018

Group members

  • David van den Beld, 1001770
  • Gerben Erens, 0997906
  • Luc Kleinman, 1008097
  • Maikel Morren, 1002099
  • Adine van Wier, 0999813

Project pages

For all the branches of the project diverging from the initial set-up and planning, please see their respective pages;

This page itself is dedicated to general information about the project, i.e. problem statement, goal, planning, etc..

Project

Project Statement

Wildfires are occurring throughout the world at an increasing rate. Great droughts in various regions across the globe are increasing the probability of wildfires to occur. National parks deal with major wildfires multiple times a year. Areas devastated by wildfires are mostly devoid of life, while potentially still having an extremely fertile soil containing all the biomass left after the fire. Artificial reforestation can accelerate the natural process which accounts for the regrowth of the forests. This process might be enhanced by means of technology, for example by deploying robots that plant seeds of saplings in these areas.

This project investigates the possibility and potential of utilizing robots to restore these devastated areas to their former glory. In order to investigate this possibility, a thorough analysis of different methods of reforestation is made first. By comparing methods of reforestation a great deal can be learned about which negative aspects of the current reforestation methods should be enhanced by a new reforestation robot. Also, this analysis will explore if a new method of reforestation is needed at all. Beyond this, two case studies are investigated. These case studies show how reforestation and forest fires are currently being handled. The case help studies help to get a better understanding of what the robot should be able to do and what it ought not to be able to do and thus help to define design criteria.

Finally, multiple preliminary designs are made for the seeding mechanism of the robot which would accomplish all necessities found during the analysis of the different reforestation methods and which follows all the criteria discovered in the case studies. Out of these designs, the one ranking highest on the criteria unraveled during the literature review and case studies is chosen to be the best suitable seeding mechanism for the future robot. Additionally, a design is made for a user interface that will allow the staff of a national park to control a swarm of robots in a user-friendly and non time consuming way. Lastly, some suggestions for future research are given, in the topics of what other crucial functionalities the robot requires, how the robots would be able to communicate among themselves during operation, and how the robots would be able to communicate with the user in case of unforeseen circumstances. To conclude, this project aims to assess the necessity of a robot to rebuild a forest in a national park after a forest fire, discover the functionalities such a robot must have and design a user interface to control such robots based on the gained information.

Planning

Below follows the planning for the project for the upcoming 9 weeks constituting the course 0LAUK0 Project: Robots Everywhere.

Table 1: Final project planning after revision problem statement and goals
Week number Task Person assigned
1
Choose definitive subject Collaborative effort of all members
Define problem statement and objectives David
Define users Adine
Obtain user requirements Gerben
Work out typical use cases Luc
Define the milestones and deliverables Maikel
Define the approach of the problem Collaborative effort of all members
Search for relevant state-of-the-art (SotA) sources, categories:
  1. Modularity
  2. (Semi-) Autonomous cars
  3. Sensors for prospecting/evaluating ground
  4. Drilling/plowing/seeding mechanism
  5. Current Forestation combat methods
All divided into the subcategories:
  1. Maikel
  2. David
  3. Luc
  4. Gerben
  5. Adine
Make project planning Collaborative effort of all members
2
Review user requirements and use cases Collaborative effort of all members
Finish collecting SotA articles and write SotA section Each member for their respective subcategory
Research different application sectors for reforestation to narrow problem statement:
  1. Reforestation in logging industry
  2. Reforestation in national parks after forest fires
  3. Reforestation in nature reserves and rain forests
All divided into categories:
  1. Adine & Maikel
  2. David & Gerben
  3. Luc
Make preliminary robot designs for the following seeding mechanisms:
  1. Drilling robot
  2. Sprinkler robot
  3. Plow robot
Divided into:
  1. David
  2. Gerben
  3. Maikel
3
Review and narrowing of problem statement Collaborative effort of all members
Extended literature review on specific subject of reforestation:
  1. Biodiversity and need for control
  2. Natural reforestation versus artificial reforestation
  3. Direct seeding (manual seeding)
  4. Aerial seeding
All divided into the following categories:
  1. Collaborative effort of all group members during own research
  2. David & Adine
  3. Luc & Gerben
  4. Maikel
Rewrite problem statement Luc
Review users for narrowed problem Adine
4
Edit the general literature review on wiki Maikel
Research the costs of reforestation methods:
  1. Natural reforestation
  2. Aerial reforestation
  3. Manual reforestation
Divided by:
  1. Adine
  2. Maikel
  3. Luc
Rewrite segment of need for control and biodiversity into one introductory segement David
Start making 3D skechtes of preliminary designs Gerben
Document wiki on extended literature review page Adine
Start keeping a log of the research and design process Adine
Look for case studies Maikel & Luc
5
Write case studies Maikel & Luc
Remake planning to fit new goal of the project Maikel
Redefine objectives to fit new goal of project David
Rewrite drilling mechanism section Gerben
Finish a first 3D model Gerben
6
Continue 3D modelling Gerben
Elaborate and extend upon current preliminary designs (including sketch) Maikel, Gerben & David
Write wiki page for case studies Luc & Maikel
Evaluate designs using criteria from literature study Adine
7
Compile an overview of project progress by week Adine
Start building a user interface Luc & Gerben
Evaluate the project and analyse pitfalls Maikel & David
Start making the presentation David & Adine
Start an editorial run over the entire wiki Maikel
Continue making user interface Luc & Gerben
8
Finish writing last segments for the wiki Collaborative effort of all members
Finish final presentation Adine, David
Complete wiki Gerben, Luc
Finish editorial run over wiki Maikel
Buffer time Collaborative effort of all members


Approach

The problem will be approached by means of a design question. What would be the best design for an effective seeding mechanism which can be used in a mobile robot deployed in a reforestation operation, and how would this robot be controlled? The gross of the project is carried out sequentially as each subject builds further upon the conclusion reached during the last subject, which is represented in the structure of this Wiki consisting of several subpages corresponding to these subjects. Albeit that the project is carried out sequentially, within each sequence several tasks are divided such that they can be carried out in parallel by different group members. During the last phase of the project, when the major milestones have been finished, the project wrap up consists of several small independent task which will allow us to abandon the sequential structure which was necessary during the other phases and carry out these tasks in parallel to gain in time.


Milestones and Deliverables

Table 2: Milestones
Date Accomplished
30-04-2018 SotA research done
03-05-2018 Have problem narrowed down
17-05-2018 Finish collecting data about reforestation techniques
24-05-2018 Have case studies finished
31-05-2018 Have preliminary designs including 3D model and pick winner design
07-06-2018 Have analysis of communication requirements and control sequence
14-06-2018 Finish user interface
14-06-2018 Presentation is finished
21-06-2018 Wiki is completely updated
Retrieved from "https://cstwiki.wtb.tue.nl/index.php?title=PRE2017_4_Groep6&oldid=61181"