Mobile Robot Control 2023 Group 9: Difference between revisions
(→Assignment 1:: done) |
(→Assignment 2:: group 9) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
[[File:Maze small.png|thumb|Maze Small with optimized node locations]] | [[File:Maze small.png|thumb|Maze Small with optimized node locations]] | ||
The nodes can be placed more efficiently by only placing nodes at places where there is a choice in directions. Numerous nodes placed one after another in a straight line require computation, but do not offer any added value to the system, since the only choice is to continue forward. In the Figure, red nodes are the start and end nodes, while dark blue nodes are the internal nodes. The light blue lines are all possible connections to follow. | The nodes can be placed more efficiently by only placing nodes at places where there is a choice in directions. Numerous nodes placed one after another in a straight line require computation, but do not offer any added value to the system, since the only choice is to continue forward. In the Figure, red nodes are the start and end nodes, while dark blue nodes are the internal nodes. The light blue lines are all possible connections to follow. | ||
<br /> | |||
== Assignment 2: == | |||
We implemented an open space approach. This approach seemed best to us, as the majority of the other approaches required setting a goal, which seemed counter-intuitive due to the uncertain odometry of the robot. Using a look-ahead distance, and a looking angle, we searched for the longest range of angles that the robot could see uninterrupted further than or equal to the look ahead distance. Then we rotated the robot to move in that direction. | |||
=== Simulations: === | |||
Easy map: https://photos.app.goo.gl/CprLeQJM3VMo75UE6 | |||
Harder map: https://photos.app.goo.gl/hmdwc545hH43QAhB9 | |||
<br /> | |||
=== Real Robot: === | |||
coming soon | |||
Revision as of 09:21, 16 May 2023
Group 9:
| Name | student ID |
|---|---|
| Ismail Elmasry | 1430807 |
| Carolina Vissers | 1415557 |
| John Assad | 1415654 |
Exercise 1:
dont_crash design: The idea was to move forward until an object is reached (0.5m within +/-45 deg) and then stop. If this object is removed, the robot should continue moving forward until it reaches another.
- Noise: it is there, and is slightly jittery. All objects at the height of the laser scanner are seen if they are not too far away (resulting in an inf range). If you walk near the robot, the legs look like lines that are oriented perpendicular to the robot.
- done
- yes, it works the same as in the simulation as long as the speed is low enough and the distance is high enough. ie, the robot cannot move extremely fast (ie 0.7m/s) or stop too close to an object (ie 0.3m) with the real robot.
- https://photos.app.goo.gl/qFkDADTsP4tE5w4A8 (see video here)
Assignment 1:
The nodes can be placed more efficiently by only placing nodes at places where there is a choice in directions. Numerous nodes placed one after another in a straight line require computation, but do not offer any added value to the system, since the only choice is to continue forward. In the Figure, red nodes are the start and end nodes, while dark blue nodes are the internal nodes. The light blue lines are all possible connections to follow.
Assignment 2:
We implemented an open space approach. This approach seemed best to us, as the majority of the other approaches required setting a goal, which seemed counter-intuitive due to the uncertain odometry of the robot. Using a look-ahead distance, and a looking angle, we searched for the longest range of angles that the robot could see uninterrupted further than or equal to the look ahead distance. Then we rotated the robot to move in that direction.
Simulations:
Easy map: https://photos.app.goo.gl/CprLeQJM3VMo75UE6
Harder map: https://photos.app.goo.gl/hmdwc545hH43QAhB9
Real Robot:
coming soon