G5 use analysis: Difference between revisions

From Control Systems Technology Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(Blanked the page)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
USE analysis


(WIP: italic text requires research)
In this analysis we will first sketch the ideal operation of the robot: its functionality and deployment. Then we will analyse the effects and implications of the robot for each of the following stakeholders: Farmers, consumers, governments, society.
Functionality and deployment
The robot operates exclusively on farm fields (potentially in a greenhouse). It removes weeds from in between the crop, without damaging the crop and without using pesticides. Potentially multiple robots work together on the same field.
Stakeholders
Farmers:
First of all, farmers will no longer have to purchase pesticides, but will have to buy and maintain the robot. While the upfront cost of a (set of) robot(s) might be bigger than the cost of pesticides, the maintenance cost will be lower and hence will be more cost effective in the long run.
Without the use of pesticides, farmers will no longer have to worry about any of the negative effects of the pesticides and hence will never suffer the consequences of potentially harmful product.
Farmers may see an increase in demand and hence revenue, as people are potentially more inclined to buy pesticide-free products.
Removed weeds can potentially be used as fertilizer or fuel.
Consumers:
No pesticides on food suggests healthier food and hence healthier and happier consumers.
Since no pesticides have to be purchased, the product are cheaper.
Governments:
Do not deal with the consequences of harmful product, contaminated (ground) water etc.
Society:
Less pesticides implies healthier ecosystem, hence better world to live in.

Latest revision as of 16:03, 24 February 2019

Retrieved from "https://dsdwiki.wtb.tue.nl/index.php?title=G5_use_analysis&oldid=66824"