Peer Review:9-Oct-2014

Back to Peer Review & Reflection.

Peer Review Table

	Luc			Tim			Frederique			Karen
	++	+	-	++	+	-	++	+	-	++	+	-
1. Quality of Work delivered	F, T	K,L			K,F,T,L		T	K,F,L		K,F,T,L
2. Ability to consult in a focused and structured way		K,F,T,L			K,L	F,T	K, T	F,L		K, F, T,L
3. Giving and Receiving feedback		K, F,T,L			K, F, T,L			K, F, T,L			K, F, T,L
4. Exectution of team role		K, T,L			K, T,L	K		K, T,L	K	T,L	K
5. Communication with fellow students	F, T	K,L			K, F, T,L		T,L	K, F		T,L	K, F
6. Honoring Agreements	F, T	K,L		F, T	K,L		F, T	K,L		F, T,L	K

Luc

Positives:

• Things you make are good, but it can always be better.
• Is focussed during meetings, has good ideas
• Does what is asked and knows what he has to do.
• Want to know what going on.

Improvement Points:

• during meetings a little more active participation
• Reading everything on the wiki (pieces of others)
• More structure in parts put on the wiki.
• Sometimes doing extra thing without being asked to do it.

Tim

Positives:

• Quality is good, short but powerful
• The input during meetings is good. more input can be given.
• very flexible with planning, good and fast communication.
• Does what is asked, always on time
• Always on time and prepared for meetings

Improvement Points:

• show more of what is done on the wiki.
• More depth like other sources etc. also to create more depth in one subject. (verder ingaan op een onderwerp)
• More participation during a meeting because your ideas are good!
• putting a little more time in the project

Frederique

Positives:

• Enough sources on the wiki, knows the core of her own part.
• Taking responsibility/chores like printing the wiki.
• Is prepared for meetings, keeps the group on track during a meeting.
• Is clear about when there are problems like when a week she can't spent a lot of time on the project.
• Does what is told to do

Improvement Points:

• Making the wiki understandable for outsiders
• making the wiki more structured.
• Reading everything the rest has done to be updated about what the rest has done.

Karen

Positives:

• Good quality of work
• has taken the role of leader, also on the wiki.
• has a lot of structure in how she works

Improvement Points:

• Make sure you are not going to do to much. letting go a bit more
• be careful with working ahead. try to do one step back sometimes to let others keep up.
• try to give other people more speaking room (when in the role of the leader)

overall

giving and receiving feedback has not really been done, so this is the same for everybody. There are no strict deadlines, so we can't comment if they are being kept to. within the whole group there is a good communication.