Peer Review:9-Oct-2014
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Back to Peer Review & Reflection.
Peer Review Table
| Luc | Tim | Frederique | Karen | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ++ | + | - | ++ | + | - | ++ | + | - | ++ | + | - | |
| 1. Quality of Work delivered | F, T | K | K,F,T | T | K,F | K,F,T | ||||||
| 2. Ability to consult in a focused and structured way | K,F,T | K | F,T | K, T | F | K, F, T | ||||||
| 3. Giving and Receiving feedback | K, F,T | K, F, T | K, F, T | K, F, T | ||||||||
| 4. Exectution of team role | K, T | K, T | K | K, T | K | T | K | |||||
| 5. Communication with fellow students | F, T | K | K, F, T | T | K, F | T | K, F | |||||
| 6. Honoring Agreements | F, T | K | F, T | K | F, T | K | F, T | K | ||||
Overall Comments:
Luc
Positives:
Improvement Points:
Tim
Positives:
Improvement Points:
Frederique
Positives:
Improvement Points:
Karen
Positives:
Improvement Points: