Peer Review:9-Oct-2014: Difference between revisions

From Control Systems Technology Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 24: Line 24:
|- valign="top"
|- valign="top"
| 1. Quality of Work delivered
| 1. Quality of Work delivered
| F
| F, T
| K
| K
|
|
|
|
| K,F
| K,F,T
|
|
|  
| T
| K,F
| K,F
|
|
| K,F
| K,F,T
|
|
|
|
Line 39: Line 39:
| 2. Ability to consult in a focused and structured way
| 2. Ability to consult in a focused and structured way
|  
|  
| K,F
| K,F,T
|
|
|
|
| K
| K
| F
| F,T
| K
| K, T
| F
| F
|
|
| K, F
| K, F, T
|
|
|
|
Line 53: Line 53:
| 3.  Giving and Receiving feedback
| 3.  Giving and Receiving feedback
|  
|  
| K, F
| K, F,T
|
|
|
|
| K, F
| K, F, T
|
|
|
|
| K, F
| K, F, T
|
|
|
|
| K, F
| K, F, T
|
|
|- valign="top"
|- valign="top"
|  4. Exectution of team role
|  4. Exectution of team role
|  
|  
| K
| K, T
|  
|  
|
|
| K
| K, T
| K
| K
|
|
| K, T
| K
| K
| K
| T
|
| K
| K
|
|
|- valign="top"
|- valign="top"
|  5. Communication with fellow students
|  5. Communication with fellow students
| F
| F, T
| K
| K
|
|
|
|
| K, F
| K, F, T
|
|
|
|T
| K, F
| K, F
|
|
|
|T
| K, F
| K, F
|
|
|- valign="top"
|- valign="top"
| 6.  Honoring Agreements
| 6.  Honoring Agreements
|F
|F, T
|K
|K
|
|
|F
|F, T
| K
| K
|
|
|F
|F, T
| K
| K
|
|
|F
|F, T
| K
| K
|
|

Revision as of 18:26, 8 October 2014

Back to Peer Review & Reflection.

Peer Review Table

Luc Tim Frederique Karen
++ + - ++ + - ++ + - ++ + -
1. Quality of Work delivered F, T K K,F,T T K,F K,F,T
2. Ability to consult in a focused and structured way K,F,T K F,T K, T F K, F, T
3. Giving and Receiving feedback K, F,T K, F, T K, F, T K, F, T
4. Exectution of team role K, T K, T K K, T K T K
5. Communication with fellow students F, T K K, F, T T K, F T K, F
6. Honoring Agreements F, T K F, T K F, T K F, T K

Overall Comments:

Luc

Positives:

Improvement Points:

Tim

Positives:

Improvement Points:

Frederique

Positives:

Improvement Points:

Karen

Positives:

Improvement Points: