Peer Review:9-Oct-2014: Difference between revisions

From Control Systems Technology Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 24: Line 24:
|- valign="top"
|- valign="top"
| 1. Quality of Work delivered
| 1. Quality of Work delivered
|  
| F
| K
| K
|
|
|
|
| K
| K,F
|
|
|  
|  
| K
| K,F
|
|
| K
| K,F
|
|
|
|
Line 39: Line 39:
| 2. Ability to consult in a focused and structured way
| 2. Ability to consult in a focused and structured way
|  
|  
| K
| K,F
|
|
|
|
| K
| K
|
| F
| K
| K
| F
|
|
|
| K, F
| K
|
|
|
|
Line 53: Line 53:
| 3.  Giving and Receiving feedback
| 3.  Giving and Receiving feedback
|  
|  
| K
| K, F
|
|
|
|
| K
| K, F
|
|
|
|
| K
| K, F
|
|
|
|
| K
| K, F
|
|
|- valign="top"
|- valign="top"
Line 80: Line 80:
|- valign="top"
|- valign="top"
|  5. Communication with fellow students
|  5. Communication with fellow students
|  
| F
| K
| K
|
|
|
|
| K
| K, F
|
|
|
|
| K
| K, F
|
|
|
|
| K
| K, F
|
|
|- valign="top"
|- valign="top"
| 6.  Honoring Agreements
| 6.  Honoring Agreements
|  
|F
|K
|K
|
|
|
|F
| K
| K
|
|
|
|F
| K
| K
|
|
|
|F
| K
| K
|
|

Revision as of 17:00, 7 October 2014

Back to Peer Review & Reflection.

Peer Review Table

Luc Tim Frederique Karen
++ + - ++ + - ++ + - ++ + -
1. Quality of Work delivered F K K,F K,F K,F
2. Ability to consult in a focused and structured way K,F K F K F K, F
3. Giving and Receiving feedback K, F K, F K, F K, F
4. Exectution of team role K K K K K K
5. Communication with fellow students F K K, F K, F K, F
6. Honoring Agreements F K F K F K F K

Overall Comments:

Luc

Positives:

Improvement Points:

Tim

Positives:

Improvement Points:

Frederique

Positives:

Improvement Points:

Karen

Positives:

Improvement Points: