Peer Review:9-Oct-2014: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|- valign="top" | |- valign="top" | ||
! width="20%" | | ! width="20%" | | ||
! scope="row" width="20%" | Luc | ! scope="row" width="20%" colspan="3" | Luc | ||
! width=" 20%" | Tim | ! width=" 20%" colspan="3"| Tim | ||
! width="20%" | Frederique | ! width="20%" colspan="3"| Frederique | ||
! width="20%" | Karen | ! width="20%" colspan="3"| Karen | ||
|- valign="top" | |||
| | |||
| width="5%" |++ | |||
|width="5%" | + | |||
| width="5%" |- | |||
| width="5%" |++ | |||
| width="5%" |+ | |||
| width="5%" |- | |||
| width="5%" |++ | |||
| width="5%" |+ | |||
| width="5%" |- | |||
| width="5%" |++ | |||
| width="5%" |+ | |||
| width="5%" |- | |||
|- valign="top" | |- valign="top" | ||
| 1. Quality of Work delivered | | 1. Quality of Work delivered | ||
| | | | ||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 17: | Line 39: | ||
| 2. Ability to consult in a focused and structured way | | 2. Ability to consult in a focused and structured way | ||
| | | | ||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 23: | Line 53: | ||
| 3. Giving and Receiving feedback | | 3. Giving and Receiving feedback | ||
| | | | ||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 29: | Line 67: | ||
| 4. Exectution of team role | | 4. Exectution of team role | ||
| | | | ||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 35: | Line 81: | ||
| 5. Communication with fellow students | | 5. Communication with fellow students | ||
| | | | ||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 40: | Line 94: | ||
|- valign="top" | |- valign="top" | ||
| 6. Honoring Agreements | | 6. Honoring Agreements | ||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Revision as of 10:49, 7 October 2014
Back to Peer Review & Reflection.
Peer Review Table
| Luc | Tim | Frederique | Karen | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ++ | + | - | ++ | + | - | ++ | + | - | ++ | + | - | |
| 1. Quality of Work delivered | ||||||||||||
| 2. Ability to consult in a focused and structured way | ||||||||||||
| 3. Giving and Receiving feedback | ||||||||||||
| 4. Exectution of team role | ||||||||||||
| 5. Communication with fellow students | ||||||||||||
| 6. Honoring Agreements | ||||||||||||
Overall Comments:
Luc
Positives:
Improvement Points:
Tim
Positives:
Improvement Points:
Frederique
Positives:
Improvement Points:
Karen
Positives:
Improvement Points: