PRE2020 4 Group3: Difference between revisions

From Control Systems Technology Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{|  
{| class="wikitable"
|+ Group members
|+ Group members
|-
|-
! Name
! Name !! Student number
! Student number
|-
| Eline Boom  || 1465872
|-
|-
| Eline Boom
| Luuk van Dorst || 1469789
| Luuk van Dorst
|-
|-
| 1465872
| Robin van de Hoef || 1479679
| 1469789
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
|+ Group members
|-
|-
! Name !! Student number !! header3
| Kyra Moviat || 1349171
|-
|-
| Eline Boom  || 1465872 || row1cell3
| Jeroen Pullen || 1477730
|-
|-
| Luuk van Dorst || 1469789 || row2cell3
| Veerle Uhl || 1462229
|}
|}



Revision as of 21:51, 2 May 2021

Group members
Name Student number
Eline Boom 1465872
Luuk van Dorst 1469789
Robin van de Hoef 1479679
Kyra Moviat 1349171
Jeroen Pullen 1477730
Veerle Uhl 1462229

Group members: Eline Boom 1465872, Luuk van Dorst 1469789, Robin van de Hoef 1479679, Kyra Moviat 1349171, Jeroen Pullen 1477730, Veerle Uhl 1462229 Interested in creating a software / theoretical solution.

Interactive software learning children how to draw, count and recognize colors. Children will get small tasks like "draw 3 red apples", the software will recognize the extent to which this task is done correctly and provide compliments and or suggested improvements.

Plan

Subjects: Child psychology, learning, image processing, software development.

Objectives: Create software to help children learn

Users: Children (of parents that want to provide a playful learning app)

State-of-the art: Alternative apps that help children either count, draw or learn colors individually. Not in a combined way, we feel the combination might improve the way to learn these things. Additionally, we hypothesize that explaining problems via a childs own drawn elements could improve their understanding.

Approach: Make up a model for how the software should work, make software in which one can draw, program software that can recognize multiple drawn objects/shapes, implement everything in a working framework according to the model.


Planning:

Investigate literature in week 2 & 3

Software model in week 2 & 3

Drawing software in week 3 & 4

Object recognition software in week 5 & 6

Implement recognition software in framework in week 7 & 8

Work on wiki and presentation during week 2-8


Milestones: Drawing software, Working object recognition, implementation in task framework

Deliverables: Peer review, Wiki, Final Presentation, The software (?)

Who will do what: yet to be determined

Journal

Name, Total, Breakdown

Eline Boom

1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting

0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting

(...) ________________

Total:


Luuk van Dorst

1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting

0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting

(...) ________________

Total:


Kyra Moviat

1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting

0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting

(...) ________________

Total:


Robin van de Hoef

1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting

0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting

(...)

________________

Total:


Jeroen Pullen

1h, 21/04/21, Research project ideas

1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting

1h, 26/04/21, Prepare poject planning

1h, 27/04/21, Research state of the art

1h, 28/04/21, Updating Wiki

1h, 29/04/21, Contacting stakeholders

0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting

1h, 29/04/21, Preparing stakeholder questions

1.5h, 30/04/21, Interview first stakeholder

________________

Total: 9 hours


Veerle Uhl

1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting

0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting

(...) ________________

Total: