PRE2019 3 Group8: Difference between revisions

From Control Systems Technology Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 65: Line 65:


8. Shahid, S., Krahmer, E., & Swerts, M. (2014). Child–robot interaction across cultures: How does playing a game with a social robot compare to playing a game alone or with a friend?
8. Shahid, S., Krahmer, E., & Swerts, M. (2014). Child–robot interaction across cultures: How does playing a game with a social robot compare to playing a game alone or with a friend?
: .....
: This study let children interact with social robots. The children played games with iCat, it turns out that the children prefer playing with iCat above playing alone. However, the children do even more prefer playing with friends.  
 


9. Stephens, H., & Jairrels, V. (2003). Weekend Study Buddies: Using Portable Learning Centers. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 35(3), 36–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990303500305
9. Stephens, H., & Jairrels, V. (2003). Weekend Study Buddies: Using Portable Learning Centers. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 35(3), 36–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990303500305

Revision as of 14:20, 6 February 2020

Abstract

Our ideas are:

  • a study buddy to help you motivate and/or concentrate
  • an app to reserve a seat in the train
  • an app to see which seats are used in TU/e buildings.


Each group has plan ready after Week 1, Plan contains:

  • subject,
  • objectives,
  • users,
  • state-of-the-art,
  • approach,
  • planning,
  • milestones,
  • deliverables,
  • who will do what

Group Members

Name Study Student ID
Teis Arets Psychology & Technology 1261991
Tom Bergmans Psychology & Technology and Electrical Engineering 1253565
Nynke Boonstra Psychology & Technology 1251155
Bob Hofstede Psychology & Technology 0950282
Emile Merle Computer Science 1244746

Planning

The planning is EMPTY

Introduction

Considering that our plan and idea is

State-of-the-Art

1. Andrews, J. and Clark, R. (2011). Peer mentoring works! Birmingham: Aston University.

This report draws on the findings of a three year study into peer mentoring conducted at 6 Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). The research findings provide empirical evidence that peer mentoring works.


2. Ahmad, M. I., Mubin, O., Shahid, S., & Orlando, J. (2017). Emotion and memory model for a robotic tutor in a learning environment. In Proceedings of the Seventh ISCA workshop on Speech and Language Technology in Education (pp. 25-26).

....

3. Ahmad, M. I., Mubin, O., & Orlando, J. (2016). Understanding behaviours and roles for social and adaptive robots in education: Teacher’s perspective. HAI 2016 - Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Human Agent Interaction, 297–304. https://doi.org/10.1145/2974804.2974829

....

4. Arnold, L., Lee, K.J., & Yip, J.C. (2016) Co-designing with children: An approach to social robot design.

.....

5. E.Hyun ; H.Yoon ; S. Son (2010) Relationships between user experiences and children's perceptions of the education robot. In 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)

....

6. Leite, I., Pereira, A., Castellano, G., Mascarenhas, S., Martinho, C., & Paiva, A. (2011, June). Social robots in learning environments: a case study of an empathic chess companion. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Personalization Approaches in Learning Environments (Vol. 732, pp. 8-12).

....

7. Meghdari, A., Shariati, A., Alemi, M., Vossoughi, G. R., Eydi, A., Ahmadi, E., … Tahami, R. (2018). Arash: A social robot buddy to support children with cancer in a hospital environment. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 232(6), 605–618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411918777520

....

8. Shahid, S., Krahmer, E., & Swerts, M. (2014). Child–robot interaction across cultures: How does playing a game with a social robot compare to playing a game alone or with a friend?

This study let children interact with social robots. The children played games with iCat, it turns out that the children prefer playing with iCat above playing alone. However, the children do even more prefer playing with friends.


9. Stephens, H., & Jairrels, V. (2003). Weekend Study Buddies: Using Portable Learning Centers. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 35(3), 36–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990303500305

......

10. Thalluri, J., O'Flaherty, J.A., & Shepherd, P.L., (2014). Classmate peer-coaching: "A Study Buddy Support scheme".

The study investigated the effects of a human study buddy. The students with a study buddy scored higher on a test compared to the ones without.


11. Werry, I. Dautenhahn, K. (1999) Applying Mobile Robot Technology to the Rehabilitation of Autistic children.

.....

12. Werry, I., Dautenhahn, K., Harwin, W. (2001) Investigating a Robot as a Therapy Partner for Children with Autism.

.....