PRE2015 3 Groep2 week5

From Control Systems Technology Group

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Experiment 1: Landing distance)
(Experiment 1: Landing distance)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Approaching Users ==
== Approaching Users ==
=== Experiment 1: Landing distance ===
=== Experiment 1: Landing distance ===
-
[[File:Opstelling.jpg|thumbnail|upright=2.5|Figure 1: Foto of the first experiment for determining the landing distance. Strips on the ground are giving the distance per 0.5m.]]
+
[[File:Opstelling.jpg|thumbnail|upright=2.5|Figure 1: Picture of the first experiment for determining the landing distance. Strips on the ground are giving the distance per 0.5m.]]
The variable landing distance is about the distance that users are still comfortable with the drone around. The optimal distance that users like  and the nearest distance that people are comfortable with drones around are determined with an experiment. The subject (an user) stands on a given spot (l=0). The distances 1, 2, 3…7 meters are marked with masking tape (distance to test subject) on the ground. The drone will start at a distance of 7 meters (= l<sub>start</sub>) as seen in figure 1. The drone will approach the person at a steady speed of approximately v = 1 m/s. It does so at a height of h = 1 meter. Whenever the test subject feels like the current distance between him and the drone is the most comfortable distance to land, the test subject will give off a sign and the drone will be given the order to land (l<sub>end</sub>). The subject will redo the test to determine the nearest distance where he or she feels comfortable. Those distances are measured and rounded per 0.25m. The results are seen below.
The variable landing distance is about the distance that users are still comfortable with the drone around. The optimal distance that users like  and the nearest distance that people are comfortable with drones around are determined with an experiment. The subject (an user) stands on a given spot (l=0). The distances 1, 2, 3…7 meters are marked with masking tape (distance to test subject) on the ground. The drone will start at a distance of 7 meters (= l<sub>start</sub>) as seen in figure 1. The drone will approach the person at a steady speed of approximately v = 1 m/s. It does so at a height of h = 1 meter. Whenever the test subject feels like the current distance between him and the drone is the most comfortable distance to land, the test subject will give off a sign and the drone will be given the order to land (l<sub>end</sub>). The subject will redo the test to determine the nearest distance where he or she feels comfortable. Those distances are measured and rounded per 0.25m. The results are seen below.
Line 49: Line 49:
The mean value of the optimal distance is 2.47m with an standard deviation of 0.67. The nearest distance has a mean of 1.00m with an standard deviation of 0.53. These means give the landing distance from this experiment, the optimal landing distance is 2.5m with a nearest landing distance of 1.0m. The drone should be programmed to keep these distances as first option and starting point of the landing procedure.
The mean value of the optimal distance is 2.47m with an standard deviation of 0.67. The nearest distance has a mean of 1.00m with an standard deviation of 0.53. These means give the landing distance from this experiment, the optimal landing distance is 2.5m with a nearest landing distance of 1.0m. The drone should be programmed to keep these distances as first option and starting point of the landing procedure.
 +
 +
==== Points of improvement ====
 +
Though the experiment came with a clear conclusion, some variables that might possibly influence have not been touched upon. The experiment above gives a general idea for a distance to keep from the users, but does for instance not distinguish between different users. These differences may concern:
 +
 +
*Age
 +
*Sex
 +
*Experience (with drones)
 +
*Length of the user
 +
*And even general (in)security or character of the user
 +
 +
But also the drone itself can have influence on results:
 +
 +
*Approaching speed
 +
*Size of the drone
 +
*Appearance of the drone
 +
*Noise
 +
*Wind generated
 +
 +
These will be left out, to be continued with further research.
=== Experiment 2: Way of approach ===
=== Experiment 2: Way of approach ===

Revision as of 10:24, 7 March 2016

Contents

Approaching Users

Experiment 1: Landing distance

Figure 1: Picture of the first experiment for determining the landing distance. Strips on the ground are giving the distance per 0.5m.

The variable landing distance is about the distance that users are still comfortable with the drone around. The optimal distance that users like and the nearest distance that people are comfortable with drones around are determined with an experiment. The subject (an user) stands on a given spot (l=0). The distances 1, 2, 3…7 meters are marked with masking tape (distance to test subject) on the ground. The drone will start at a distance of 7 meters (= lstart) as seen in figure 1. The drone will approach the person at a steady speed of approximately v = 1 m/s. It does so at a height of h = 1 meter. Whenever the test subject feels like the current distance between him and the drone is the most comfortable distance to land, the test subject will give off a sign and the drone will be given the order to land (lend). The subject will redo the test to determine the nearest distance where he or she feels comfortable. Those distances are measured and rounded per 0.25m. The results are seen below.

Experiment Optimal distance (m) Nearest distance (m)
1 2.25 1.0
2 2.75 0.75
3 2.5 1.0
4 2.25 0.75
5 2.0 0.75
6 1.75 0.5
7 3.5 2.0
8 3.5 1.75
9 1.75 0.5


The mean value of the optimal distance is 2.47m with an standard deviation of 0.67. The nearest distance has a mean of 1.00m with an standard deviation of 0.53. These means give the landing distance from this experiment, the optimal landing distance is 2.5m with a nearest landing distance of 1.0m. The drone should be programmed to keep these distances as first option and starting point of the landing procedure.

Points of improvement

Though the experiment came with a clear conclusion, some variables that might possibly influence have not been touched upon. The experiment above gives a general idea for a distance to keep from the users, but does for instance not distinguish between different users. These differences may concern:

  • Age
  • Sex
  • Experience (with drones)
  • Length of the user
  • And even general (in)security or character of the user

But also the drone itself can have influence on results:

  • Approaching speed
  • Size of the drone
  • Appearance of the drone
  • Noise
  • Wind generated

These will be left out, to be continued with further research.

Experiment 2: Way of approach

Figure 2: Schematic representation of the experiment setup. Situation A, displayed in red. Situation B, displayed in green. Situation C, displayed in blue.

It's not online interesting to look at the best landing distance, but also at the way the drone approaches the user.For this, a distinction is made between three different situations. For a description of these situation see the list below and figure 2. In all these situations the test person is positioned at l = 0. The drone starts at a distance lstart and height hstart.

Situation A
The drone flies horizontally to a certain distance lend then the drone lands vertically.
Situation B
The drone flies diagonally, at an angle α, to a certain point at distance lend and height hend. Then the drone lands vertically.
Situation C
The drones lowers itself vertically to a certain height hend. It then flies horizontally to a certain distance lend before it lands vertically on the ground.

During the experiment the three situation will get different values for the distance lstart and lend. These distances will be 6, 4 and 2 meters. Note that the drone will never fly away from the test person. So when the distance lstart equals 4 meters, only the values of 4 and 2 meter will be used for lend.

After each test variation the test person is asked to rate the experience with the values very bad/bad/neutral/good/very good.

Personal tools