Airports under a microscope - Group 4 - 2018/2019, Semester B, Quartile 3

<link rel="shortcut icon" href="https://www.tue.nl/favicon-64.ico" type="image/x-icon"> <link rel=http://cstwiki.wtb.tue.nl/index.php?title=PRE2018_3_Group4&action=edit"stylesheet" type="text/css" href="theme.css">

Page navigation

1. Root
2. Notes
3. Initial ideas
4. Project setup
5. State of the Art
6. Specific problem
7. Present situation
8. Solutions
9. Conclusion
10. Discussion

Airports under a microscope

In this section, we will take a look at Dutch airports as such to find criteria of what our anti-drone system should take into account. Furthermore, we will look at the main difference between certain airports in the Netherlands to check whether these differences might lead to different solutions that might suit different kinds of airports better. As a result of that, these differences might be used as criteria for our decision model. First of all, we will be looking at some of the larger commercial airports of the Netherlands.

Airports

Schiphol

• Passenger amount 2018: 70.956.604 (https://www.schiphol.nl/nl/schiphol-group/pagina/verkeer-en-vervoer-cijfers/)

Eindhoven Airport

• Passenger amount 2018: 6.237.755 (http://nieuws.eindhovenairport.nl/170577-minder-sterke-groei-eindhoven-airport-in-2018)

Rotterdam The Hague Airport

• Passenger amount 2018: 1.908.158 (https://www.rotterdamthehagueairport.nl/content/uploads/2019/01/Totaal-per-jaar.pdf)

Maastricht Aachen Airport

• Passenger amount 2018: 274.986 (http://nieuws.eindhovenairport.nl/170577-minder-sterke-groei-eindhoven-airport-in-2018)

Groningen Airport Eelde

• Passenger amount 2018: 228.698 (http://nieuws.eindhovenairport.nl/170577-minder-sterke-groei-eindhoven-airport-in-2018)

Differences

---

Back to the root page.

References